Home   »   About Us   »   History   »   Healthcare Uncovered   »   Summits   »   Components   »   Rate Regulation
About Us

Description: Rate Regulation

Many economists feel that market failure is inherent and unavoidable in health care.  A purely market-based health care system will lead to socially undesirable outcomes – people with limited resources will not access services and will become sick, hurting themselves and infecting others.    As a result, the public sector plays a significant role in health care.  The public sector plays a strong role in setting fees for the services that it buys.

The federal government, through the Medicare program, and state governments generally through their Medicaid programs have attempted to restrain health care costs by limiting the amount that they pay providers for services.  In 1980, prospective rate setting was a key policy tool used by more than 30 states to control rising health care costs.  It was developed with the explicit encouragement of the federal government through two acts of Congress in 1972 and 1983.  By the mid-1990’s state rate setting almost disappeared.  

Despite the dominance of prospective rate setting in Medicare, federal support for state rate setting dissipated in the late 80’ and early ‘90’s.  Principally, the decline reflected the development of managed care and capitation as alternative means to control health spending growth.  It also represented a renewed preference for private over public price controls.  

Example 1: MedPAC

Medicare Rate Regulation through the 17 member Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) is an attempt to restrain costs by providing reimbursement rates that are in line with what it would cost a reasonably efficient provider. There is evidence that low cost providers can make positive margins on Medicare reimbursement.  Recent data illustrate that low cost hospitals have margins of just over 5% and high cost hospitals margins of negative 15%.  The vast majority of the low cost hospitals also had good physician relationship and scored high on quality metrics.

Example 2: Maryland

Maryland All-Payers system – The seven member Health Services Cost Review Commission reviews and approves rates that hospitals can charge for its services.  It also provides financial information about Maryland hospitals to the public.  Based on a federal waiver from Medicare, it sets rates for all payer: private insurance; HMO’s; Medicare and Medicaid.  Since 1974, it has saved Marylanders about $1.3  billion in hospital costs by keeping the cost per admission below the national rate.  It also spreads the responsibility for uncompensated care across all payers.  It is the last fully rate regulated (and Medicare waivered) state in the country.

Assumptions & Common Business Model

Many healthcare providers feel that publicly set rates do not provide them adequate reimbursement.  

Traditional fee for service reimbursement schemes have largely been displaced due to managed care arrangements which promise to lower costs through providing cost-effective care.

Costs have continued to climb under managed care arrangements but political forces have effectively challenged a return to rate regulation. 

Health providers and elected officials generally favor a more market driven, competitive approach to establishing rates.

In the current political environment, public and private leaders have hoped that the market would exercise control that has yet to materialize.  The alternative to this approach is a very difficult political discussion about winners and losers in a regulated system.

The Maryland experience, though an aberration, is supported by both providers and public officials because of stability and predictability that the regulated system providers.  It has kept Maryland’s costs below the national average.


Tie to Specific Leverage Point

Transparency across multiple pricing and reimbursement strategies – A system with regulated rates will enable the various payers to have a clearer sense of what a service will cost them and it will allow the provider to know what they will be reimbursed for their services.

Healthcare defined as a public good – the strong role played by the public sector in health care leads some to believe that it is (or should be) a public good and, therefore, the public sector has the authority to regulate the rates it will pay for a service.



Page tags

 
Top of Page
Insight        Initiatives        Invitations        About Us        Donate

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.6.

Designed by
Free Range Studios